'Obesity Is Not a Personal Problem\r'

' corpulency is Not a Personal fuss As the obesity wave crashes over the united States, more than Americans ar paying out of carrier bag to flourish the $33 billion commercial f be industry (Spake 283). As American’s waistbands get across to expand, they immerse themselves in one of the largest, most immoral consumer markets: the fish loss industry. Amanda Spake, author of â€Å"Rethinking Weight”, addresses the headspring as to who should comprehend the over each cost of cargo loss programs. Spake challenges that insurance companies should pay for the expenses that obese concourse encounter.\r\nThis, she states, is imput optionable to the fact that obesity is a biological â€Å"disease” and it should be treated and paid for desire any other critical illness (283). In this clause, Spake does not present the sizeableness of physical activity, hardly discussing unsuccessful dieting experiences and bad genetic makeup. Although Spake curtly suggests that exercising is an advantage to those who atomic number 18 obese, she puts the solitary tear for obesity on the genetic aspect. From 1986 to 2000, the number of battalion who are severely obeseâ€which is identified by having a body mass index of 40 or moreâ€has quadrupled, from about 1 in 200 adults to 1 in every 50.\r\nThis shock statistic has caused more people to be aware of this emerging occurrence that has swept over the United States. corpulency has medical professionals worrying; not save are the numbers of hard people continuing to spring but weight-related medical costs are soaring. health fearfulness costs for illnesses due to obesity develop today exceeded those related to both smoking and alcoholism. The obesity pestilent is a big contributor to skyrocketing health care costs in the United States, partly due to the weight-related diseases that come hand-in-hand with obesity.\r\nAilments such as type II diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and hig h cholesterol are near connected to obesity and an alarming 80 percent of obese adults suffer from one of these life-threatening diseases (Spake 283). numerous research foundations are now connecting obesity to a person’s genetic makeup, calling it a biological development that an mortal cannot verify. Spake suggests that insurance companies should dressing the costs of obesity as it is a genetically and biologically determined disease thus the individual does not require the ability to misplace weight on their own.\r\nAs a result, researchers suggest that including the give-and-take of obesity in health care plans energy bring science and sanity to the anarchy of weight loss (Spake 286). Many researchers do not find obesity as a disease in fear that unhealthy weight-loss programs will nearday be considered acceptable treatment and ultimately mandated to be cover by insurance. Although Spake validates her assertions by backing up her speech with credible opinions and statistics, she weakens her statement by not addressing the importance of physical activity. Maria Pfisterer is an obese mother who Spake claims has essay every weight-loss strategy imaginable.\r\nHowever, nowhere does it say that in addition to the drugs and â€Å"quick-weight-loss fads” Pfisterer had attempted to include an exercise regime. She claimed that all of the programs she tried resulted in a few pounds broken and quite a few more gained; constantly returning to the same 197 to 202 pound range. Being heavy(a) is the result of one thing: eating more nourishment than one stings (Spake 285). Nowhere in the article does Spake suggest that physical activity is a effective, healthy and inexpensive way to lose weight, choosing to put forth the idea that weight loss comes only from high-priced dieting programs.\r\nIn her article, Spake claims that genetics are the sole factor for obesity in America. in that location are many other factors mentioned in the artic le that play into someone’s weight including the food they eat, their level of physical activity, and societal factors such as advertising. Also, Spake quotes Arthur Frank, director of George Washington University’s Weight commission Program, â€Å"So saying to an obese person who wants to lose weight, ‘ wholly you have to do is eat less,’ is standardised saying to a person suffering from asthma, ‘All you have to do is breathe better’” (284).\r\nObesity and asthma are two very unalike things therefore should not be compared. An individual who is overweight can take control of their weight-gain by taking more personal responsibility and making fitter choices. However, asthma is an inflammatory disorder that can charter at any time which causes an individual to suspire or gasp for air where an individual cannot control its effects. Not everyone agrees that obesity should be considered a disease, some stating that the obesity epidemi c can be disordered by individuals taking more personal right for their wellbeing and opting to make healthier lifestyle choices (Spake 283).\r\nIn an alarmed attempt to make readers believe that obesity should be considered a disease and insurance companies should cover the cost of the individual’s expenses, Spake fails to provide comely evidence to support her claim. She maintains that overweight people have a genetic flaw that causes them to be predisposed to weight gain. Physical exercise, which is seldom mentioned in Spake’s article, is an important weight loss tool that helps to burn the extra calories an individual’s body does not burn on its own.\r\nSpake portrays a defective argument that invalidates her main purpose. People with health insurance should get wind to see what is covered and seek healthier, less-expensive alternatives to fix the things that are not included. Regardless of what â€Å"Rethinking Weight” suggests, overweight indi viduals have an equal opportunity to replace their existing lifestyle with healthier habits. Works Cited Spake, Amanda. â€Å"Rethinking Wight. ” Writing and Reading for ACP Composition. Eds. doubting Thomas E. Leahey and Christine R. Farris. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2009. 282-88. Print.\r\n'