'Gay Marriage: the Recognition of Equal Human Rights Essay\r'

'In America, great deal hit on to the Declaration of Independence as an instruction execution of their rights. Part of the Declaration of Independence clearly states, â€Å"We appreciation these truths to be self-evident, that all men be created tally, that they be endowed by their Creator with certain nontransferable Rights, that among these atomic number 18 Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” (Jefferson 80). Gays are hu world beingnesss too, and they should equally be able to enthral the hu domain rights.\r\nIf we believe that ethereal rights are equal regardless of their bring upual orientation; consequently why do sprightlys book to press for equal posts in the church building building, law, and psychological compare? Gay passel, their families, and their friends are engagement for these rights. They want equality for experiencelys including pitchive wedlock, and trades union benefits that the unbroken man- charwoman labor unions e njoy. Gay brformer(a)hood dies an option because umpteen jocund couples want the equality of human rights.\r\nGays realize their rights are being abolished by the fact that they are non allowed to heavyly connect and enjoy the privileges as matrimonial couples. Only 12 states in America and partition of Columbia legally allow cheerful nuptials. The twelve states are: Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, mum, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington (Millst wizard). mom is the first state that legalized man espousals on May 2004 (Tying the K non). Although joyouss can legally marry in these states, the couples cast off limited rights.\r\nDOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) restricts federal conjugation benefits; therefore, it pr make upts funnys from receiving the insurance benefits for organization employees, Social Security benefits, immigration, and the file of phrase tax returns (Burns). The documentary, Tying the Knot sho ws that many gay couples stay together for a retentive period of time, whether they are espouse or not. They circumstances their gos: mentally, physically, and economically. But when a mate dies, the other(a) spouse does not get his/her rights as a radiation diagram opposite-sex spouse would get, which includes pension benefits and/or the house (be capaciousings).\r\nThe mental picture shows a sad reality to this current grievance toward gay couples. While gays’ rights are being suppressed, the incertitudes produce to come up, â€Å"Is being gay an option? ”. This question becomes a part of controversy for gay nuptials. harmonize to Dan Eden, a writer for an online journal Viewz unmatched since 1996 on his research, â€Å" queerness is a congenital condition much resembling being ‘left-handed’. ” He entrusts a scientific point of view that homosexuals are born that bureau; hormones also take sexuality, beside chromosomes. Homosexual is not a lifestyle, homosexuals are born gays and they do not carry being gay as a lifestyle.\r\nThe subject area Memo, a political newsletter since 2011, interviewed passel and asked them, â€Å"Do you think people born gay or submit to be gay? ” When they answered, the interviewers added another question, â€Å"When did you choose to be straight? ” which made people think. The field Memo wants people to think about this, era Eden wants to make a clear dictation that â€Å"being gay is not an option”. The Obama presidentship has been trying to bring equal rights for gays, by stating that LGBT’s rights (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) also part of the human rights (Clinton).\r\nHillary Rodham Clinton, the US secretary of state in 2009 stated, â€Å"All people deserve to be treated with dignity and obtain their human rights respected, no matter who they are or whom they love. ” It is clear that people drop an equal rights and exemp tion to love, to choose their partner, and to get married despite their sex’s orientation. On the other hand, according to Ben Newman, a public relations director who had been in position as a â€Å"healed gay”, being gay is an option and can be cured. His create has been changed to protect confidentiality.\r\nNewman explained this in his story regarding how his family tail endground and puerility experiences made him being attracted towards men, although he was already married to a woman and had children from her. Later on, he followed a reparative therapy: a reverse treatment through psychotherapeutics to change his sexual orientation. He succeeded to come back to the corporation as a â€Å"straight” man after 2 years and 3 months in the reparative therapy (Newman). In this situation, although gay wedding is already legal in some states, gay couples still struggle with their positions in regime and law, and also with their positions among church and sta te.\r\nIn government and law: when will gay couples receive an equal law for their conjugal union? Does government have the power to define espousals? It seems that even when gay couples are allowed to marry, they are without any marriage rights, because of DOMA. In regard to their position between church and state, there is much apparitional objection towards gay marriage. In the United States, Christianity and Catholicism are the chief(a) religions. These religions believe in God and believe that the marriage is rightly between a man and a woman.\r\nAlthough certain churches approve gay marriage (Tying the Knot), the dread is, how it might refer the government, and how it might cause people manipulate the marriage to get the government’s benefits (Boston). Furthermore, in State of the Union 2004, President George W. provide stated: The union of a man and woman is the most enduring human institution, honored and boost in all cultures and by every religious faith. Age s of experience have taught humanity that the commitment of a husband and wife to love and to serve one another promotes the welfare of children and the stability of society.\r\nMarriage cannot be severed from its cultural, religious and essential roots without change the good influence of society (Burns 7). President scrub described marriage as cultural and natural way to expand the society, because of the fact that marriage between man and woman would produce and foster children. These man-woman marriages are honored by faith and beliefs. He does not want the changes in marriage values affect the society in a bad way. In addition, for people that do not agree on gay marriage, they have skepticism about how gay marriages will affect children in the afterlife.\r\nAlthough people tackle that gay couples will not have children, entirely in reality they do, either from previous relationships, adoptions or simply have to raise children from other family’s member. However, c hildren who are raised by gay couples posit legal assurance from their â€Å"gay parents”. According to Anne Pollock, a graduate student in social studies from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, â€Å"The first priority of civil marriage should be to provide a secure milieu for all children.\r\nThe religious right’s study that children benefit from their [antigay activists] assaults against gay families is nothing less than hypocritical. Burns)” If the gay parents do not have equal legal rights, like what stated in DOMA; so that, if something slip aways to one of the gay parent, their children also will suffer from the consequences. For example, if a working gay spouse gets into accident at work and dies, the lines would show up for the other hold up spouse when they are denied for the support, which she/he needs to live with the children. For this reason, the benefit is future’s assurance for children themselves; lastly, it seems sanctimonious to take away these rights from the children.\r\nThe other skepticism towards gay marriage is that it will harm children. An author of several(prenominal) books about marriage, Maggie Gallagher states, â€Å"First and foremost, children need stable families to become the kind of adults who will in turn provide stable families for their future children… Legalizing same-sex marriage would sanction families that would disrobe children of the experience of either motherhood or sufferhood. (Burns)” Gallagher wants people to think that a normal family has a father and a mother to raise their children; these children will smelling upon their parents to build their own family in the future.\r\nThe family that does not have man-woman parents will create a different effect to their children. Therefore, Gallagher believes that man-woman marriage will produce children, and on the other hand, gay couples could not produce children. Specifically, gay marriage will harm children me ntally and in long term, our population. Moreover, there are other questions toward gay marriage: will it promote social stability or harm society? For years, gay people have been struggling for their recognition, although they get married in a party with friends and families, but they did not get marry legally.\r\nHowever, they have not think about their future assurance such as: the insurance benefits for government employees, Social Security benefits, immigration, or the filing of joint tax returns. Their futures seem uncertain; something might happen and take away the rights that a normal opposite-sex marriage would legally have. In addition, The California Health query Survey held a research regarding physical affliction from legal same-sex marriage and how they legally recognized themselves affect their mental heath, and it showed various numbers about how significant the recognition from society for whom they are (Wight).\r\nIf gay marriage becomes legal, there is some ass urance for their future; and, if they are socially accepted for whom they are, the society will sack forward and become a stable and break in society. On the other hand, there are skepticisms that gay marriage will harm the society. According to surface-to-air missile Schulman, a popular New York writer, gay marriage is selfish and degrades moral values from our society (Burns). muckle deserve to love and choose their partner, but if their choices are not base on acceptable morality, then they should not do it.\r\nGallagher is strengthening Schulman’s conviction; Gallagher points out about how marriage is the needs of man and woman, in terms sexually, to produce children, financially, and socially (Burns). In conclusion, in term of human rights, gays are human too. They have rights to be treated equally. The searching of equality has been happening for years, from the rights of black people, women’s rights to mix-race marriage rights. people have the rights to cho ose their own partner, their love, and their assurance in the future. Why legalize gay marriage if the marriage itself has taken its rights (DOMA)?\r\nPeople mention morality and society in terms for our children future, by rejecting gay marriage and its rights. Gay marriage is not the only problem that people have nowadays, there are other occurrences that ignore the morality and society; there are crimes that ignore morality values (rape), shooting in schools or public places, robbery, and many other crimes that occur. We live in a world that demands morality in society; but, what kind of morality and society that we have now †do we value ourselves better than gay people?\r\n'