The Human Nature of Medea

Euripides contemporaries and classical scholars resembling point out the non-Aristotelean elements in Medea, this might intimidate todays reader. Euripides, kind of of following the guidelines established by Aristotle in his Poetics, has a soul-stirring psychological truth of gentle nature. This is clear when we examine the monologues given up by Medea during the play. Each legal transfer develops the lawsuit and creates a sealed audience empathy. Medea is non a disaster of a considerably person with a flaw. It is the cataclysm of what eruptions occur in aneself and adepts party when morality is annihilated. However, his catastrophe is non hardly a encroachment of a moral code, merely alike an act in violation of human moderateness and dignity. fleck the culture and politics of ancient Greece take hold changed allwhere the centuries, the basic human emotions such(prenominal) as anger, fear and rawness that Euripides has written about subscribe to not. This makes his work more widely accepted and understood today than that of his contemporaries. Aristotle states that one of the vital elements in a successful tragedy is Character: There will be an element of character in the play, if . . . what a influential person says or does reveals a certain moral intend; and a good element of character, if the purpose so revealed is good.

Such accountability is possible in every type of personage, even in a woman or a slave, though the one is perhaps an inferior, and the other a wholly worthless human beings(Aristotle 242). It is clear from the outset that Euripides has not created the protagonist of whom Aristotle speaks. Medeas purpose is not good. This is evident in her first-year exchange with the Chorus: But I am deserted, a refugee, thought process nothing of by my husband, something he won in a foreign land. I suffer no mother or brother, If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper